6/12/ · Essay on architecture. Architecture has always been an important of a culture. It is neither just the way people think of beauty nor visiting site. Architecture indeed, tells us how people think of the world, their ideas and religions. Architectural features of a place during periods of time can portray the history of that region Architecture is among one of the most fascinating aspects of man's work since the beginning of time. Architecture entails a timeline, as well as an expression of life, the society, and the talents of many people. It is a useful art and, like painting and sculpture, it can also be a fine art that touches all of our lives 12/9/ · The evolution of modern architecture has started just after the evolution of building materials in 19th century and it has inspired many architects to take a chance of a new way of thinking. An architect Reese Rowland said: ‘Architecture is the only art form that is functional.’ thats why it has such a powerful impact on our lives/5(3)
Theory of Architecture: [Essay Example], words GradesFixer
Andrew Benjamin argues that Australian architecture must open itself to the wider world of public policy. We can do this, he believes, by acknowledging that architecture is always traversed by the complexities of culture. This is an article from the Architecture Australia archives and may use outdated formatting.
Online Media Centre, by Lyons. Image: Trevor Mein, courtesy Kayne Construction, architecture essay. The NMA, architecture essay, by ARM in association with Robert Peck von Hartel Trethowan. Images: Eric Sierins. Federation Square by Lab architecture studio architecture essay association with Bates Smart. Image: cbdphoto, architecture essay. This move, architecture essay, which separates ornament and culture, links Modernist architecture to the culture of modernity.
Reading this now two things emerge, architecture essay. The first is a statement of intent — Modernist architecture clearly defines itself in relation to culture, architecture essay.
The second is a question — how today can the relation between architecture and culture to be understood? In purely strategic terms, the question is relevant, since policy — usually in terms of government policy and even architectural criticism — often uses straightforwardly economic criteria to make decisions or draw conclusions. Yet, it is clear that the presence of architecture in the daily lives of citizens underscores its ineliminable cultural presence.
The task in this essay is to address this presence and to draw conclusions that might have relevance for policy directed decisions, as well as evaluative ones, architecture essay.
This essay was prompted by the refusal of public money to the Australian pavilion at the recent Venice Biennale, but more importantly, by the need to engage with the issues that such a refusal raises. For the most part, these issues do not architecture essay to the relative strength or weakness of Australian architecture, architecture essay, but rather to the way in which it defines itself. Architecture in this country does not define itself in any singular way, however, there is a prevailing perception.
One relates to activities that are often understood as specific to architecture. The other is inextricably connected to the realm of human existence and demarcates the ways in which human life differentiates itself from nature. Taken in isolation each is potentially problematic — holding to the exclusivity of the culture of architecture denies its presence as part of human society, while thinking of architecture as nothing other than cultural precludes any consideration of, for example, the way different materials realize different effects within architectural practice.
What matters is the way concerns of one understanding can — perhaps should — intrude into the other. Recognizing that these two different senses of culture are interrelated can provide a way through this complex set of considerations. Insisting this interrelation introduces another defining element into the equation.
Indeed, it marks the point of relation: the public, architecture essay. Architecture is essentially public. This is hardly a surprising claim, architecture essay, but, as with many truths, the acceptance of what it asserts is conterminous with the refusal of its consequences.
A choice emerges. Architecture can architecture essay its sphere of operation as the construction of objects that are understood as only ever private, and which thus only open up the already circumscribed worlds of individual activity — for example, architecture essay, the house.
Or architecture can insist on its inherently public nature, architecture essay. The distinction between these two positions — opening architecture essay or opening out — is not a distinction between architecture as an academic activity on the one hand and as a worldly activity on the other.
Instead, different conceptions of practice are at work here — in both instances there can be a championing of materials over programme; in both, a concern with the environmental consequences of building can be paramount; equally, issues pertaining to sustainability can drive each of them. Yet architecture essay distinction is crucial.
It involves the extent to which there is an affirmation — architecture essay all the difficulties and complexities that this term brings — of the inherently public nature of architecture.
OPENING IN. Architecture can be described as opening in when it defines itself as an activity of construction for individuals to suit individual needs. In working from the outside in, space is created that reproduces the architecture essay of clients — the world takes on the veneer of the private.
This is a conception of the private in which the individual — either singularly or as a unit — has primacy.
Architecture begins to define itself in these terms when this conception of practice — and world creation — becomes the basis for future discussions and evaluations. Once the object is understood as having been created for the individual — including a conception of the public as the totality of individuals — architecture essay follows that architecture is the expression of personalities, and that the built object expresses the personality of the client.
Or at least that this would be the desired intent on both sides. Equally, because construction, understood in this light, is always defined by a conception of individual taste, there cannot be a link to any conception of culture beyond the generalization of the individual.
It is not difficult to imagine that once this is accepted as the definition of architecture — and it is a self-definition that works at a range of different scales — architecture will be inevitably understood as a series of produced built, constructed, et cetera objects that are created by individuals to serve architecture essay ends, architecture essay.
Since the public is always counterposed to the individual — and this is true even when the public is understood as the abstract presence of architecture essay totality of individuals — architecture will be defined in terms of singular relations.
Architecture essay relation is will always be between architect and client, and architecture will remain enclosed within that relation. Once there is a turn towards the interior there is no need to think in terms of the registration of the exterior, architecture essay. Those elements — at a minimum, the exterior to which architecture opens out — pertain to culture understood as part of the public domain, architecture essay. The limit of this definition is architecture essay to do with a specific programme, architecture essay, although the apparent preoccupation of Australian architecture with domestic housing only exacerbates the situation.
The insistence on the interior and the associated definition of architecture in terms of individual concerns — and reciprocally architecture essay only of concern for individuals — make it a simple matter to locate architecture as no more than an economic activity. In this framework the house would have a bespoke suit as its correlate. The refusal of the public is, architecture essay, of course, architecture essay, a position taken in relation to the inherently public nature of architecture.
The already present place of culture needs to be noted. Here, architecture essay, it concerns the capacity architecture essay an object to stage a relation. This may seem an overly complex point, but it is not. Staging a relation is not just the presence of programme, nor is it just the use of one combination of materials rather than another, architecture essay.
Staging is the way that the interarticulation of a programme and materials works to present a specific conception of the programme in question. The differences, for example, between two museums are to be found in terms of what they stage.
That is, the way the architecture essay of the programme, the geometry proper to its realization, and the materials once combined yield the object. However, architecture essay, it is architecture essay object as a site of activity.
The activity is the way the building stages its presence, architecture essay. Two things need to be noted here. The first is that staging is integral to the way an object works as architecture. The second is that programme, geometry, and the use of materials have both a historical and cultural dimension.
This means that staging necessarily inscribes the architectural object with broader cultural considerations. Opening intherefore, becomes an attempt to avoid defining architecture in terms of this inscription of wider public concerns, architecture essay.
The counter position — opening architecture essay — becomes the way of acknowledging the presence of staging and of allowing this architecture essay to play a pivotal role in establishing a definition of architecture.
OPENING OUT. The move to the outside — allowing the architecture essay to be registered internally and the architecture essay to have an external registration — allows us to insist on the public nature of architecture precisely because here the two senses of culture interact. This is not a question of the house versus the public building. Rather, this particular definition provides the basis for more generalized architecture essay of architecture.
It is important to note, however, that the culture that is registered is neither unified nor benign. Indeed, the interplay of dominance and opposition is fundamental to its schismatic and agonistic nature. This opens an area of discussion that cannot be pursued in this context. However, it indicates, nonetheless, that the registration of external elements will not be the registration of a unified culture precisely because the culture in question is not grounded in any sense of unity — other than that of simple dominance or the identification with the totality of a culture with its most conservative instance, architecture essay, for example the identification of a culture with the national.
Moreover, such an acknowledgment might be present in quite different ways. The complex architecture essay of the Online Multimedia Centre, at the St Albans campus of Victoria University by Lyons, for example, architecture essay, opens up a potential urban field, architecture essay.
This does not occur by locating the architecture on the surface, architecture essay, but by allowing the surface to help create a visual urbanism. The importance of the latter is that they take the creation of surfaces beyond any concern with the decorative. At the NMA identity becomes a site of endless negotiation and the symbols carry that positioning, architecture essay. Both work together to define the site. Rather than concentrate on the symbols per se, architecture essay, what is fundamental is that they introduce a conception of time that is not determined architecture essay immediacy.
The symbols stage a more complex and always-to-be-determined conception of identity. There is still a connection between symbols and what is symbolised.
However, architecture essay, what needs to be noted is that it is hard to establish the link as definitive. Indeed, that is the point. The public nature of the architecture, architecture essay, and its democratic impulse, are found in the symbolism because the work attests to the complex and cosmopolitan nature of the public.
The inscription of an implicit urbanism into The Ian Potter Centre: NGV Australia, the construction of the squares themselves as explicitly urban, the complex relation that both have to the urbanism created by the intersections of the grid and the lanes and fed by public transport hubs, means that each element becomes an important figure constructing the urban terrain. While this does not occur literally, Federation Square develops — both externally and internally within the NGV itself — the urbanism of its setting, while demanding a rethinking if how interventions of this scale within a pre-existing fabric are to be understood.
Architecture essay significance of these projects cannot be understood in terms of the image they project. The fact that they are significant does not mean that they set the measure for what architecture has to look like. It is not a question of appearance. Affirming the presence of the cultural — by noting the ineliminability of the public, while allowing both to have a complex and contested status — allows architecture to be opened up beyond any reduction.
Be that a reduction to the simply economic or to the merely cultural, it goes without saying that such a position is necessarily contestable. Moreover, this inherent contestability may result in the refusal of the interplay of cultures and therefore in the championing of the interdependence of the private and the economic.
The victory of one over the other reveals an essential truth. Namely, that the presence of the conflict — the inescapable hold of contestability — is the first step in any argument for the inherently cultural nature of the architectural, architecture essay.
Published online: 1 May Words: Andrew Benjamin. Architecture Media acknowledges the traditional custodians of the land and waters of Australia.
Architecture is a Language: Daniel Libeskind at TEDxDUBLIN
, time: 18:29How to Write a Killer Architecture Essay | The Complete Guide - Architecture Lab
Architecture Essays The essays below were written by students to help you with your own studies. If you are looking for help with your essay then we offer a comprehensive writing service provided by fully qualified academics in your field of study 1/11/ · Neil Leach, in his essay in the book Architecture and its Ethical Dilemmas, edited by the Cambridge scholar and architect Nicholas Ray, investigates the link between ethics and aesthetics. He broadly defines aesthetics as the process of architectural design 1/5/ · This essay uses “culture” in two senses. One relates to activities that are often understood as specific to architecture. The other is inextricably connected to the realm of human existence and demarcates the ways in which human life differentiates itself from nature
No comments:
Post a Comment