Aug 23, · Atomic Bomb Essay Words | 3 Pages. Atomic Bomb Essay On August 2, Albert Einstein wrote to President Franklin D. Roosevelt. This was right before the start of World War 2. In this letter Einstein and several other scientists told Roosevelt of the efforts Hitler was making to purify U in which he hoped to make an atomic bomb.5/5(1) Jul 27, · The Atomic Bomb Essay Words | 3 Pages. The dropping of The Atomic Bomb Essays on Hiroshima and Nagasaki in August of was a definite turning point in the Pacific War of World War II. Earlier that year, Germany had been defeated and the world then turned its attention to the Pacific war.5/5(1) May 13, · Atomic Bomb Essay. Words | 9 Pages. Atomic Bombing Of Hiroshima On the quiet morning of August 6, , the United States shocked the world by dropping an atomic bomb over the city of Hiroshima, Japan. (blogger.com) Hiroshima was a major industrial city with an estimated population of almost , people
Atomic bomb Essay Example For Students - words | Artscolumbia
The reason why the United States was compelled to employ the use of a more lethal weapon in Hiroshima and Nagasaki in Japan has been at the heart of many scholarly writings. The question is, why did the United States decide to engage a deadly attack and yet there was a league of nations charged with conflict resolution? The idealists came up with an international organization in the name of the League of Nations to address problems of war. The use of atomic bomb therefore was shaped by international variables such as scientific research and discoveries.
Causes to any phenomena are multi-dimensional meaning that they should be studied in a multi-disciplinary way such as geographically, psychologically, politically and economically, essay on atomic bomb. It therefore follows that causes to the use of atomic bomb in Japan should be divided into particular and profound causes.
Particular causes are those that are immediate while profound causes are underlying issues. Historians are interested with immediate causes of war while political scientists try to explore long-term causes but both will be dealt with in this study. Taylor examined that war is like a road accident because it has the immediate causes such as over speeding as well as long-term causes such as the nature roads.
Scholars have been interested in both immediate and underlying causes for application of atomic bomb in Hiroshima. The application of the strategy did not have a single cause because WWII had roots in the society and the then international system.
Quency wright in his works about study of war vol. War is as old as human existence and characterizes the nature of human beings. Essay on atomic bomb clear relationship exists between human nature and conflict. ST Augustine claimed that war is part of society and human life because of sin, man exhibits love for hurtful things and vain which constitutes the source of human conflict.
Benedict de Spinoza observes in a short article called political treatise that war occurs because man is led by passion not reason hence there is a conflict between passion and reason, essay on atomic bomb. Confucius on his part postulated that there is deceit and cunningness among human beings leading to war thus war is an innate factor in human beings. John Stoessinger claimed that people are victims of their own perceptional limitations because they are limited in their comprehension of natural phenomena and hence are bound to make wrong judgments.
This paper examines the particular and profound causes that made the United States to utilize the atomic bomb in Japan.
The United States applied atomic bombs on Japan in order to force the Japanese officials to cease-fire. It invaded Japan because of the desire to subdue it and cut short the war. Japan made its own land a battlefield without taking into consideration the social welfare of its citizens.
The U. had to put to an end to what Japan was planning because if it essay on atomic bomb ahead with its plans, more than one million Americans and Britons would have lost their lives. Dropping of atomic essay on atomic bomb in Hiroshima is said to have solved many humanitarian problems because many people could have died could Japan have attacked the U.
There has been a heated debate over the American verdict of using a weapons of mass destruction on Hiroshima. President Truman never considered it a big issue. Losses in an attack of Japan would have been great, essay on atomic bomb. The bomb was meant to soften Japanese stance and make it to abandon war plans. Indeed the bomb-facilitated negotiations among Japanese officials since they noticed that war had more implications on them than any other person.
Earlier attempts to put essay on atomic bomb an end the war by use of nuclear weapons had failed to bear fruits as Japanese military were not willing to back off the fight. This forced the U, essay on atomic bomb. to use atomic bombs since it perceived that many lives would be lost if Japan continued with the war. It is believed that, President Harry Truman used atomic bombs on Japan as a way of intimidating Stalin so that he could keep him out of the war.
However, the general officers did not approve this move and they denounced their commander-in-chief. In late October, General MacArthur went back to the Philippine island of Layette. The Japanese started to use kamikaze pilots in an anxious attempt to obliterate Allied ships. Quite a few more bloody battles waited ahead for American forces.
Americas recorded more than twenty five thousand fatalities at the mêlée of Iwo Jima and essay on atomic bomb fifty thousand at the encounter of Okinawa. After these battles, though, nothing was left to stop an Allied invasion of Japan. These extremely bloody battles deeply disturbed military officials who were planning for an attack of Japan.
Japanese resistance to such an attack would have been fervent, essay on atomic bomb. President Truman was informed about the new scientific development in after the death of Roosevelt in Manhattan project was erected in specifically to develop an atomic bomb.
The bomb was manufactured in Los Alamos, New Mexico with J. Robert Oppenheimer as the director. The effectiveness and efficiency of the weapon was first experienced in Mexico desert in The bomb did not contribute much to the end of Japanese aggression since it only increased the speed of surrender because the officials had already begun engaging in surrender talks, essay on atomic bomb.
Long before the dropping of the bombs, Japanese leaders were determined to surrender and were taking steps toward ending the war. The United States secretary of war Stimson was much concerned with deliberations on the use of the bomb due its effects. He argued that the decision to drop the atomic bomb on Hiroshima was made essay on atomic bomb after vigilant deliberation by Truman and his advisers of all the courses of action open to them to end the war at the lowest possible cost.
However, the question arose as to whether there was anything like a decision to use the bombs, or whether Truman and his advisers were carried along by events. The bombs cost more than two billion dollars, and required the work of scores of top scientists, thousands of workers and several industrial firms.
After all this time and spending, Truman had to use the atomic bombs at one time and the war proved to be the best time to use them. The dropping of the second bomb gave the impression of having its own momentum.
Prevalent detestation of and vengeance against the Japanese for the bombing of Pearl Harbor may have produced the impetus for dropping the atomic bombs. To many Americans, including Truman, it warranted almost any act against it in vengeance. Expressing his feeling of revenge, Truman essay on atomic bomb in a private letter written soon after the bombing of Nagasaki, that nobody was more bothered by the use of the atomic bombs than he was, but he was deeply troubled over the uncalled-for attack by the Japanese on Pearl Harbor.
dominance in the already brewing Soviet-American disagreement, which has, of course, prearranged the postwar worldwide order. Their analyses of planning for the postwar world, from forward, essay on atomic bomb, underline official description of the Soviet Union as the primary menace to U. primacy in world affairs. Nonetheless, while the U. hegemony, and both were sufficiently served by dropping the atomic bomb.
The bombings precipitated the end to Second World War because leaders were shocked even though they were still reluctant to surrender. The deaths did not go down well with the emperor who took an extra step of urging political leaders to cease-fire and agree to talk with the rest of the world. The emperor was respected because he was both a temporal and spiritual leader.
He could be reached in the times of crisis to provide advices and directions. Japan was reported to be preparing weapons of mass destruction such as chemical bombs. The weapons were on the wrong essay on atomic bomb according to the United States government. Japan was an aggressive state that would use the weapons in unjustifiable ways such as revenging against innocent people. The United States president, Truman, essay on atomic bomb, felt that Americans were going to be affected most and hence there was a reason to intervene before things got worse.
Americans had been casualties of Japanese recklessness and President Truman knew that anything was possible with Japan because they were determined to go on with war, essay on atomic bomb. The only way that would guarantee mass happiness in the United States and essay on atomic bomb allied states was to attack the destroyer before it could strike.
Many Americans had lost their lives and essay on atomic bomb and the government was unhappy with that, it was its mandate to ensure that no more destruction could be carried out to its people. The American government saw Japan as a threat to its quest for attaining natural resources in the region. The United States wanted to access the region but Japan was a threat because of conflicting interests. The World War II provided an opportunity that saw the United States weaken the competitor.
This was seen as territorial aggrandizement because the United States was unhappy with the way Japan controlled the territory full of natural resources. The only way to scare the enemy was to apply weapons of mass destruction to its citizens, essay on atomic bomb. The United States was not after making peace because the administrators of Japan were in Tokyo but the bombs were dropped kilometers away.
Japan was forced to surrender and promised never to engage in military aggression. The United States was trying to reduce its opponents in its pursuit to global domination.
The Japanese could have worsened things could they have been left to go on with their weapon formation. The United States is always known to be a self-glorious nation.
The war provided a good opportunity for them to demonstrate to the whole world what they had achieved in the world of science. Talking about it alone could not be enough since other essay on atomic bomb such as Russia and China could not believe. The war provided a good chance for them to apply practically whatever they had.
Other states could believe in their allegations and live according to their wishes lest they experience the same. The bomb could be applied to any aggressor but Japan was chosen because it was a major competitor. President Truman therefore opted for the bomb to achieve glory for Americans hence fostering nationalism. Americans today view themselves as the most united people mainly because of common history created by leaders such as Truman.
America had other means of stopping the war but they never thought about them since they saw application of the bomb to be serving a number of reasons.
Application of the bomb therefore was meant to serve self-interests and wishes not the will of the majority; it only served the essay on atomic bomb of Americans not the whole world as it was thought.
At this point, long term issues are discussed such as the behavior of leaders both in the American government and Japanese government, the political climates in both states, societal variables such as ethnic composition, essay on atomic bomb, institutional structure of governments that is the roles played by various leaders and finally the international system. We analyze how the variables contributed in the application of the atomic bomb to Hiroshima, essay on atomic bomb, Japan.
The causes associated with these variables are observed over a particular time since they are not immediate. Some critics of the application of the bomb argue that United States was sending a message to communist states urging them to beware of what capitalists can do. The arguments are accurate to some extent because during preparation of the bomb, no communist state was involved instead it was only Canada and United Kingdom all of which are capitalists.
The United States could not have applied the bomb to an aggressive capitalist state.
The Atomic Bomb: Crash Course History of Science #33
, time: 12:05Atomic Bomb Essay Examples - Free Research Papers on blogger.com
Jul 27, · The Atomic Bomb Essay Words | 3 Pages. The dropping of The Atomic Bomb Essays on Hiroshima and Nagasaki in August of was a definite turning point in the Pacific War of World War II. Earlier that year, Germany had been defeated and the world then turned its attention to the Pacific war.5/5(1) Apr 28, · The Atomic Bomb was used more as a weapon of surrender upon the people of Japan than it was used as a display of power towards the Soviets in The Japanese military had already shown an unwillingness to surrender throughout the war, and this feeling was made famous by their infamous use of suicide pilots, called kamikazes Apr 04, · The United States applied atomic bombs on Japan in order to force the Japanese officials to cease-fire. It invaded Japan because of the desire to subdue it and cut short the war. Japan made its own land a battlefield without taking into consideration the social welfare of
No comments:
Post a Comment