> Actions speak louder than words. Their actions are deafeningly clear. Yes, their actions are pumping money into it, and dismiss that without a source by saying they are doing so “simply to create jobs”, which is an absurd idea when they could have created those jobs with other research You will receive full credit if your essay is between and words. Writing less than words or more than words will decrease your score. If your essay contains less than words or more than words, you will not receive any score points for your essay on any of the seven factors. Your essay will be scored zero An admission essay is an essay or other written statement by a candidate, often a potential student enrolling in a college, university, or graduate school. You can be rest assurred that through our service we will write the best admission essay for you
Idioms Practice: Exercise for common idioms - IELTS buddy
Do actions speak louder than words essay ESSAY. THIRD ESSAY. PEOPLES AND COUNTRIES. Translated by J. Inwith the view of amplifying and completing certain new doctrines which do actions speak louder than words essay had merely sketched in Beyond Good and Evil see especially aphorismdo actions speak louder than words essay, Nietzsche published The Genealogy of Morals.
This work is perhaps the least aphoristic, in form, of all Nietzsche's productions. For analytical power, more especially in those parts where Nietzsche examines the ascetic ideal, The Genealogy of Morals is unequalled by any other of his works; and, in the light which it throws upon the attitude of the ecclesiast to the man of resentment and misfortune, it is one of the most valuable contributions to sacerdotal psychology. We are unknown, we knowers, ourselves to ourselves: this has its own good reason.
We have never searched for ourselves—how should it then come to pass, that we should ever find ourselves? Rightly has it been said: "Where your treasure is, there will your heart be also. It is to those hives that we are always striving; as born creatures of flight, and as the honey-gatherers of the spirit, we care really in our hearts only for one thing—to bring something "home to the hive! As far as the rest of life with its so-called "experiences" is concerned, which of us has even sufficient serious interest?
or sufficient time? In our dealings with such points of life, we are, I fear, never properly to the point; to be precise, our heart is not there, and certainly not our ear. Rather like one who, delighting in a divine distraction, or sunken in the seas of his own soul, in whose ear the clock has just thundered with all its force its twelve strokes of noon, suddenly wakes up, and asks himself, "What has in point of fact just struck?
Of necessity we remain strangers to ourselves, we understand ourselves not, in ourselves we are bound to be mistaken, for of us holds good to all eternity the motto, "Each one is the farthest away from himself"—as far as ourselves are concerned we are not "knowers. My thoughts concerning the genealogy of our moral prejudices—for they constitute the issue in this polemic—have their first, bald, and provisional expression in that collection of aphorisms entitled Human, all-too-Human, a Book for Free Mindsthe writing of which was begun in Sorrento, during a winter which allowed me to gaze over the broad and dangerous territory through which my mind had up to that time wandered.
This took place in the winter of ; the thoughts themselves are older. They were in their substance already the same thoughts which I take up again in the following treatises:—we hope that they have derived benefit from the long interval, that they have grown riper, clearer, stronger, more complete. The fact, however, that I still cling to them even [Pg 3] now, that in the meanwhile they have always held faster by each other, have, in fact, grown out of their original shape and into each other, all this strengthens in my mind the joyous confidence that they must have been originally neither separate disconnected capricious nor sporadic phenomena, but have sprung from a common root, from a fundamental " fiat " of knowledge, whose empire reached to the soul's depth, and that ever grew more definite in its voice, and more definite in its demands, do actions speak louder than words essay.
That is the only state of affairs that is proper in the case of a philosopher. We have no right to be " disconnected "; we must neither err "disconnectedly" nor strike the truth "disconnectedly. What matters that to us, us the philosophers? Owing to a scrupulosity peculiar to myself, which I confess reluctantly,—it concerns indeed morality ,—a scrupulosity, which manifests itself in my life at such an early period, with so much spontaneity, with so chronic do actions speak louder than words essay persistence and so keen an opposition to environment, epoch, [Pg 4] precedent, and ancestry that I should have been almost entitled to style it my " â priori "—my curiosity and my suspicion felt themselves betimes bound to halt at the question, of what in point of actual fact was the origin of our "Good" and of our "Evil.
Did my own " â priori " demand that precise solution from me? that new, immoral, or at least "amoral" " â priori " and that "categorical imperative" which was its voice but oh! how hostile to the Kantian article, and how pregnant with problems! Fortunately I soon learned to separate theological from moral prejudices, and I gave up looking for a supernatural origin of evil.
A certain amount of historical and philological education, to say nothing of an innate faculty of psychological discrimination par excellence succeeded in transforming almost immediately my original problem into the following one:—Under what conditions did Man invent for himself those judgments of values, "Good" and "Evil"?
And what intrinsic value do they possess in themselves? Have they up to the present hindered or advanced [Pg 5] human well-being? Are they a symptom of the distress, impoverishment, and degeneration of Human Life? Or, conversely, is it in them that is manifested the fulness, the strength, and the will of Life, its courage, its self-confidence, its future?
On this point I found and hazarded in my mind the most diverse answers, I established distinctions in periods, peoples, and castes, I became a specialist in my problem, do actions speak louder than words essay, and from my answers grew new questions, new investigations, new conjectures, new probabilities; until at last I had a land of my own and a soil of my own, a whole secret world growing and flowering, like hidden gardens of whose existence no one could have an inkling—oh, how happy are we, we finders of knowledge, provided that we know how to keep silent sufficiently long.
My first impulse to publish some of my hypotheses concerning the origin of morality I owe to a clear, well-written, and even precocious little book, in which a perverse and vicious kind of moral philosophy your real English kind was definitely presented to me for the first time; and this attracted me—with that magnetic attraction, inherent in that which is diametrically opposed and antithetical to one's own ideas.
The title of the book was The Origin of the Moral Emotions ; its author, Dr. Paul Rée; the year of its appearance, I may almost say that I have never read [Pg 6] anything in which every single dogma and conclusion has called forth from me so emphatic a negation as did that book; albeit a negation tainted by either pique or intolerance. I referred accordingly both in season and out of season in the previous works, at which I was then working, to the arguments of that book, not to refute them—for what have I got to do with mere refutations but substituting, as is natural to a positive mind, for an improbable theory one which is more probable, and occasionally no doubt, for one philosophic error, another.
In that early period I gave, do actions speak louder than words essay, as I have said, the first public expression to those theories of origin to which these essays are devoted, but with a clumsiness which I was the last to conceal from myself, for I was as yet cramped, being still without a special language for these special subjects, still frequently liable to relapse and to vacillation.
To go into details, compare what I say in Human, all-too-Humanpart i. Rée, like all the English moral philosophers, sees the ethical "Thing-in-itself" ; finally, Aph. Similarly, Aph. Rée thinks:—rather is it that this object is only imported, under certain definite conditions, and always as something extra and additional. In reality I had set my heart at that time on something much more important than the nature of the theories of myself or others concerning the origin of morality or, more precisely, the real function from my view of these theories was to point an end to which they were one among many means.
The issue for me was the value of morality, do actions speak louder than words essay, and on that subject I had to place myself in a state of abstraction, in which I was almost alone with my great teacher Schopenhauer, to whom that book, with all its passion and inherent contradiction for that book also was a polemicturned for present help as though he were still alive.
The issue was, strangely enough, the value of the "un-egoistic" instincts, the instincts of pity, self-denial, and self-sacrifice which Schopenhauer had so persistently painted in golden colours, deified and etherealised, that eventually they appeared to him, as it were, do actions speak louder than words essay, high and dry, as "intrinsic values in themselves," on the strength of which [Pg 8] he uttered both to Life and to himself his own negation.
But against these very instincts there voiced itself in my soul a more and more fundamental mistrust, a scepticism that dug ever deeper and deeper: and in this very instinct I saw the great danger of mankind, its most sublime temptation and seduction—seduction to what? to nothingness? This exaggerated estimation in which modern philosophers have held pity, is quite a new phenomenon: up to that time philosophers were absolutely unanimous as to the worthlessness of pity.
I need only mention Plato, Spinoza, La Rochefoucauld, and Kant—four minds as mutually different as do actions speak louder than words essay possible, but united on one point; their contempt of pity.
This problem of the value of pity do actions speak louder than words essay of the pity-morality I am an opponent of the modern infamous emasculation of our emotions seems at the first blush a mere isolated problem, a note of [Pg 9] interrogation for itself; he, however, who once halts at this problem, and learns how to put questions, will experience what I experienced:—a new and immense vista unfolds itself before him, a sense of potentiality seizes him like a vertigo, every species of doubt, mistrust, and fear springs up, the belief in morality, nay, in all morality, totters,—finally a new demand voices itself.
Let us speak out this new demand : we need a critique of moral values, the value of these values is for the first time to be called into question—and for this purpose a knowledge is necessary of the conditions and circumstances out of which these values grew, do actions speak louder than words essay, do actions speak louder than words essay under which they experienced their evolution and their distortion morality as a result, as a symptom, as a mask, as Tartuffism, as disease, as a misunderstanding; but also morality as a cause, as a remedy, as a stimulant, as a fetter, as a drugespecially as such a knowledge has neither existed up to the present time nor is even now generally desired.
The value of these "values" was taken for granted as an indisputable fact, which was beyond all question. No one has, up to the present, exhibited the faintest doubt or hesitation in judging the "good man" to be of a higher value than the "evil man," of a higher value with regard specifically to human progress, utility, and prosperity generally, not forgetting the future. Suppose the converse were the truth! Suppose there do actions speak louder than words essay in the "good man" a symptom of retrogression, such as a danger, a temptation, a poison, a narcoticby means of which the present battened on the future!
More [Pg 10] comfortable and less risky perhaps than its opposite, but also pettier, meaner! So that morality would really be saddled with the guilt, if the maximum potentiality of the power and splendour of the human species were never to be attained?
So that really morality would be the danger of dangers? Enough, that after this vista had disclosed itself to me, I myself had reason to search for learned, bold, and industrious colleagues I am doing it even to this very day. It means traversing with new clamorous questions, and at the same time with new eyes, the immense, distant, and completely unexplored land of morality—of a morality which has actually existed and been actually lived! and is this not practically equivalent to first discovering that land?
If, in this context, I thought, amongst others, of the aforesaid Dr. Rée, I did so because I had no doubt that from the very nature of his questions he would be compelled to have recourse to a truer method, in order to obtain his answers.
Have I deceived myself on that score? I wished at all events to give a better direction of vision to an eye of do actions speak louder than words essay keenness, and such impartiality.
I wished to direct him to the real history of moralityand to warn him, while there was yet time, against a world of English theories that culminated in the blue vacuum of heaven.
Other colours, of course, rise immediately to one's mind [Pg 11] as being a hundred times more potent than blue for a genealogy of morals:—for instance, greydo actions speak louder than words essay which I mean authentic facts capable of definite proof and having actually existed, or, to put it shortly, the whole of that long hieroglyphic script which is so hard to decipher about the past history of human morals.
This script was unknown to Dr. Rée; but he had read Darwin:—and so in his philosophy the Darwinian beast and that pink of modernity, the demure weakling and dilettante, who "bites no longer," shake hands politely in a fashion that is at least instructive, the latter exhibiting a certain facial expression of refined and good-humoured indolence, tinged with a touch of pessimism and exhaustion; as if it really did not pay do actions speak louder than words essay take all these things—I mean moral problems—so seriously.
I, on the other hand, think that there are no subjects which pay better for being taken seriously; part of this payment is, that perhaps eventually they admit of being taken gaily.
This gaiety indeed, or, to use my own language, this joyful wisdomis a payment; a payment for a protracted, brave, laborious, and burrowing seriousness, which, it goes without saying, is the attribute of but a few.
But on that day on which we say from the fullness of our hearts, "Forward! our old morality too is fit material for Comedy ," we shall have discovered a new plot, and a new possibility for the Dionysian drama entitled The Soul's Fate —and he will speedily utilise it, one can wager safely, he, the great ancient eternal dramatist of the comedy of our existence.
If this writing do actions speak louder than words essay obscure to any individual, and jar on his ears, I do not think that it is necessarily I who am to blame. It is clear enough, on the hypothesis which I presuppose, namely, that the reader has first read my previous writings and has not grudged them a certain amount of trouble: it is not, indeed, a simple matter to get really at their essence. Take, for instance, my Zarathustra ; I allow no one to pass muster as knowing that book, unless every single word therein has at some time wrought in him a profound wound, and at some time exercised on him a profound enchantment: then and not till then can he enjoy the privilege of participating reverently in the halcyon element, from which that work is born, in its sunny brilliance, its distance, its spaciousness, its certainty.
In other cases the aphoristic form produces difficulty, but this is only because this form is treated too casually. An aphorism properly coined and cast into its final mould is far from being "deciphered" as soon as it has been read; on the contrary, it is then that it first requires to be expounded —of course for that purpose an art of exposition is necessary. The third essay in this book provides an example of what is offered, of what in such cases I call exposition: an aphorism is prefixed to that essay, the essay itself is its commentary.
Certainly one quality which nowadays has been best forgotten—and that is why it will take some time yet for my writings [Pg 13] to become readable—is essential in order to practise reading as an art—a quality for the exercise of which do actions speak louder than words essay is necessary to be a cow, and under no circumstances a modern man! Those English psychologists, who up to the present are the only philosophers who are to be thanked for any endeavour to get as far as a history of the origin of morality—these men, I say, offer us in their own personalities no paltry problem;—they even have, if I am to be quite frank about it, in their capacity of living riddles, an advantage over their books— they themselves are interesting!
These English psychologists—what do they really mean? We always find them voluntarily or involuntarily at the same task of pushing to the front the partie honteuse of our inner world, and looking for the efficient, governing, and decisive principle in that precise quarter where the intellectual self-respect of the race would be the most reluctant to find it for example, in the vis inertiæ of habit, or in forgetfulness, or in a blind and fortuitous mechanism and association of ideas, do actions speak louder than words essay, or in some factor that is purely passive, reflex, molecular, or fundamentally stupid —what is the real motive power which always impels these psychologists in precisely this direction?
Is it an instinct for human disparagement somewhat sinister, vulgar, and malignant, or perhaps incomprehensible even to itself? or perhaps a touch of pessimistic jealousy, do actions speak louder than words essay, the mistrust of disillusioned idealists who have become gloomy, [Pg 18] poisoned, and bitter? or a petty subconscious enmity and rancour against Christianity and Platothat has conceivably never crossed the threshold of consciousness?
or just a vicious taste for those elements of life which are bizarre, painfully paradoxical, mystical, and illogical? or, as a final alternative, a dash of each of these motives—a little vulgarity, a little gloominess, a little anti-Christianity, a little craving for the necessary piquancy?
But I am told that it is simply a case of old frigid and tedious frogs crawling and hopping around men and inside men, do actions speak louder than words essay, as if they were as thoroughly at home there, as they would be in a swamp.
I am opposed to this statement, nay, I do not believe it; and if, in the impossibility of knowledge, one is permitted to wish, so do I wish from my heart that just the converse metaphor should apply, and that these analysts with their psychological microscopes should be, at bottom, brave, proud, and magnanimous animals who know how to bridle both their hearts and their smarts, and have specifically trained themselves to sacrifice what is desirable to what is true, any truth in fact, even the simple, bitter, ugly, repulsive, unchristian, and immoral truths—for there are truths of that description.
All honour, then, to the noble spirits who would fain dominate these historians of morality. But it is certainly a pity that they lack the historical [Pg 19] sense itself, that they themselves are quite deserted by all the beneficent spirits of history. The whole train of their thought runs, as was always the way of old-fashioned philosophers, on thoroughly unhistorical lines: there is no doubt on this point.
The crass ineptitude of their genealogy of morals is immediately apparent when the question arises of ascertaining the origin of the do actions speak louder than words essay and judgment of "good.
This pride must be brought low, this system of values must lose its values: is that attained? Now the first argument that comes ready to my hand is that the real homestead of the concept "good" is sought and located in the wrong place: the judgment "good" did not originate among those to whom goodness was shown.
Much [Pg 20] rather has it been the good themselves, that is, the aristocratic, the powerful, the high-stationed, the high-minded, who have felt that they themselves were good, and that their actions were good, that is to say of the first order, in contradistinction to all the low, do actions speak louder than words essay, the low-minded, the vulgar, and the plebeian.
Essay on \
, time: 10:25Extemporaneous Speech: Topics, Definition and Tips | HandmadeWriting
Aug 20, · Rebecca Solnit is the author of 17 books, including an expanded hardcover version of her paperback indie bestseller Men Explain Things to Me and a newly released anthology of her essays about places from Detroit to Kyoto to the Arctic, The Encyclopedia of Trouble and Spaciousness Dec 23, · “The overarching connection in all of these crises has to do with the great Western heresy – that we can be saved as individuals, that any of us alone can be in right relationship with God That individualist focus is a form of idolatry, for it puts me and my words in the place that only God can occupy, at the center of existence, as the An admission essay is an essay or other written statement by a candidate, often a potential student enrolling in a college, university, or graduate school. You can be rest assurred that through our service we will write the best admission essay for you
No comments:
Post a Comment